Repression Of Unfair Competition To Maintain Equitable Network Environment - Brothersoft

Online, March 9, 2011 (Newswire.com) - In recent years, network navy is pervasive, they are becoming increasingly rampant, making malicious suppress opponents common occurrences. Additionally, unfair enterprise competition are more and more significant, these phenomenons drive us into a serious consideration of where exactly the competition legal boundary and moral bottom line lie in? What are the elements of unfair competition or even of the criminal offense? What is the network navy acting as? Whether they should be liable or not?

Nowadays, enterprises have to go across a rocky road to success, consequently we are tolerant of different competitive means even including disharmony. However, our tolerance never intends to neglect competition legal boundary as well as moral bottom. Irrigation at the non-ad placement of a popular forum is not an unfamiliar marketing tool for us any more, the network staff, employed by PR firms, are subordinate to online marketers, they post and create buzz for their employers. Due to varieties of defamation antenna, some PR firms once again rush into the public eye, evoking extensive consciousness of duality of network navy. On one hand, they can impel brand new production, attract attention and participation, on the other hand, they cause a large scale trepidation on reputation slander either. By defamation of competitors, network navy is doing harm to enterprise reputation and affecting normal operations. Slanders are turning to be much hiddener than ever before by special network navy. For instance, the 360 vs QQ dispute shortly before, and the Brothersoft defamation antenna.

The other day, a certain network navy on Macfee, falsely calumniates brothersoft, without reference to any site security or service dispute. Despite of patient communication from brothersoft, he is still staging the farce.

Of course, clicking a mouse is equivalent straightforward, but such an easy movement by the network navy may leads an enterprise even an industry into crisis, then whether they should assume corresponding responsibility or not? According to relevant laws and regulations, those maliciously deliberate doings causing grave consequences, should be regarded as business reputation or product reputation crime. Additionally, both the wrong doing implementation person and the PR firm must assume criminal responsibility.

Indubitability, the Internet is such a world, advocating equality and freedom. Unfortunately, a stream of non-objective comments injected by network navy confuses public opinion from time to time. The Internet also needs to crack down on illegal activities, only in this way, Internet will turn into a pure mouthpiece for public opinion.